Six blind men are brought to examine an elephant that has come to their village.

  • The first man touches the trunk and says that the elephant is like a thick snake.
  • The second man touches the tusk and says that the elephant is like a spear.
  • The third man touches the ear and says that the elephant is like a fan.
  • The fourth man touches the leg and says that the elephant is like a tree.
  • The fifth man touches the side and says the elephant is like a wall.
  • The sixth man touches the tail and says the elephant is like a rope.

Each of the blind men is convinced that he is right and that everyone else is wrong.

American poet John Godfrey Saxe’s version of the story concludes with a simple, beautiful line:

Each was partly in the right, And all were in the wrong.​

So, oft in theologic wars, The disputants, I ween, Rail on in utter ignorance, Of what each other mean, And prate about an Elephant, Not one of them has seen!

The moral of this story is that the information we have about the world represents a tiny fraction of the information available, yet we use it to form a view of how the world works.

The world is always infinitely more complex than our narrow observation windows would allow us to understand.

I'm reminded of David Foster Wallace's famous This Is Water speech in 2005 (emphasis mine):

"The point here is that I think this is one part of what teaching me how to think is really supposed to mean. To be just a little less arrogant. To have just a little critical awareness about myself and my certainties. Because a huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong and deluded."

Built with LogoFlowershow